| Consensus Report Week 5 | |||||||||||||||
| Away | Car | Bea | Ben | Pac | Jag | Chi | Vik | Pat | NyJ | Cha | Tns | Red | Pan | Cow | Ram |
| #Picks: | 0 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 27 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 32 | 28 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 32 |
| Pct: | 0% | 40% | 46% | 43% | 77% | 6% | 31% | 6% | 91% | 80% | 29% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 91% |
| Pts: | 0 | 55 | 74 | 89 | 197 | 27 | 60 | 14 | 233 | 190 | 41 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 353 |
| Home | Eag | Fal | Ste | Buc | Sea | Bro | Sai | Dol | Bil | Brn | Rav | NyG | 49s | Rai | Lio |
| #Picks: | 35 | 21 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 33 | 24 | 33 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 33 | 34 | 34 | 3 |
| Pct: | 100% | 60% | 54% | 57% | 23% | 94% | 69% | 94% | 9% | 20% | 71% | 94% | 97% | 97% | 9% |
| Pts: | 430 | 143 | 149 | 83 | 26 | 342 | 142 | 312 | 12 | 24 | 154 | 382 | 233 | 395 | 10 |
| Season To Date Consensus ( Sorted By Difference in Confidence Points Wagered ) |
||||||||||||
| Team vs. Line |
Times Picked |
Opp. Picked |
Diff. | Pct. | Opp. Pct. |
Diff. | Pts. Bet |
Opp. Pts. |
Diff. | |||
| St.Louis (4-0-0) | 114 | 24 | + 90 | 82.6% | 17.4% | + 65.2% | 1036 | 98 | + 938 | |||
| Indianapolis (2-1-0) | 91 | 12 | + 79 | 88.3% | 11.7% | + 76.7% | 972 | 66 | + 906 | |||
| Oakland (3-1-0) | 105 | 33 | + 72 | 76.1% | 23.9% | + 52.2% | 1063 | 229 | + 834 | |||
| San Diego (3-1-0) | 111 | 27 | + 84 | 80.4% | 19.6% | + 60.9% | 978 | 153 | + 825 | |||
| Jacksonville (2-2-0) | 112 | 26 | + 86 | 81.2% | 18.8% | + 62.3% | 890 | 137 | + 753 | |||
| Philadelphia (2-2-0) | 96 | 41 | + 55 | 70.1% | 29.9% | + 40.1% | 1044 | 303 | + 741 | |||
| Green Bay (3-1-0) | 100 | 38 | + 62 | 72.5% | 27.5% | + 44.9% | 890 | 238 | + 652 | |||
| Baltimore (3-1-0) | 93 | 45 | + 48 | 67.4% | 32.6% | + 34.8% | 933 | 312 | + 621 | |||
| Minnesota (1-3-0) | 87 | 51 | + 36 | 63.0% | 37.0% | + 26.1% | 818 | 317 | + 501 | |||
| Tampa Bay (2-1-0) | 73 | 30 | + 43 | 70.9% | 29.1% | + 41.7% | 531 | 170 | + 361 | |||
| NY Jets (2-2-0) | 89 | 49 | + 40 | 64.5% | 35.5% | + 29.0% | 643 | 303 | + 340 | |||
| NY Giants (3-1-0) | 79 | 59 | + 20 | 57.2% | 42.8% | + 14.5% | 710 | 395 | + 315 | |||
| Pittsburgh (2-1-0) | 56 | 47 | + 9 | 54.4% | 45.6% | + 08.7% | 405 | 300 | + 105 | |||
| San Francisco (3-1-0) | 82 | 56 | + 26 | 59.4% | 40.6% | + 18.8% | 541 | 463 | + 78 | |||
| New Orleans (2-1-0) | 57 | 46 | + 11 | 55.3% | 44.7% | + 10.7% | 369 | 330 | + 39 | |||
| Atlanta (2-2-0) | 68 | 70 | - 2 | 49.3% | 50.7% | - 01.4% | 484 | 452 | + 32 | |||
| Tennessee (0-3-0) | 49 | 54 | - 5 | 47.6% | 52.4% | - 04.9% | 327 | 342 | - 15 | |||
| Miami (3-1-0) | 64 | 74 | - 10 | 46.4% | 53.6% | - 07.2% | 515 | 553 | - 38 | |||
| Kansas City (1-3-0) | 58 | 80 | - 22 | 42.0% | 58.0% | - 15.9% | 404 | 657 | - 253 | |||
| Detroit (0-3-0) | 32 | 71 | - 39 | 31.1% | 68.9% | - 37.9% | 193 | 627 | - 434 | |||
| Seattle (2-2-0) | 50 | 88 | - 38 | 36.2% | 63.8% | - 27.5% | 358 | 825 | - 467 | |||
| Chicago (2-1-0) | 17 | 86 | - 69 | 16.5% | 83.5% | - 67.0% | 68 | 814 | - 746 | |||
| New England (1-3-0) | 32 | 106 | - 74 | 23.2% | 76.8% | - 53.6% | 202 | 987 | - 785 | |||
| Cleveland (3-1-0) | 25 | 113 | - 88 | 18.1% | 81.9% | - 63.8% | 112 | 900 | - 788 | |||
| Carolina (1-3-0) | 24 | 114 | - 90 | 17.4% | 82.6% | - 65.2% | 217 | 1021 | - 804 | |||
| Cincinnati (2-2-0) | 35 | 103 | - 68 | 25.4% | 74.6% | - 49.3% | 151 | 1005 | - 854 | |||
| Buffalo (0-4-0) | 20 | 118 | - 98 | 14.5% | 85.5% | - 71.0% | 117 | 989 | - 872 | |||
| Washington (0-4-0) | 29 | 109 | - 80 | 21.0% | 79.0% | - 58.0% | 200 | 1077 | - 877 | |||
| Arizona (1-2-0) | 14 | 91 | - 77 | 13.3% | 86.7% | - 73.3% | 76 | 957 | - 881 | |||
| Dallas (0-4-0) | 16 | 121 | - 105 | 11.7% | 88.3% | - 76.6% | 78 | 1326 | - 1248 | |||
Copyright © 2000
Poolguys Football Pool